This reflection will be somewhat inconclusive, because I haven’t fully processed the ideas behind ontology and epistemology. Philosophy is one course that I didn’t take in my undergrad coursework. Though I’ve given it some thought this week, and I took some time to look at other resources on the topic, at this point I can’t say with certainty that there’s a camp to which I fully subscribe between the realistic, naturalistic or advocacy/participatory. If one is considered eclectic, that would probably be where I fall. I feel that I get my knowledge in a number of ways, not just one way. Perhaps as I share my thoughts, my worldview will become more apparent.
Since we’re talking about worldview, assumptions, bias, etc., I must mention that I’ve been a Christian for 36 years as that most likely affects my worldview. Some might say that that makes me closed-minded. I disagree. I consider myself to be flexible in my thinking and can see things from a variety of perspectives. I’m also kind, thoughtful, and I don’t push my views on others.
Many times I have difficulty finding absolutes that lead me to argue for one side or another in a situation. I can usually see multiple sides and see benefits to the multiple sides. In those cases, I eat the hay, leave the sticks, live in peace, and enjoy the benefits. For example, take lecture and active learning – I can see benefits to both. Some want to throw out lecture totally. I can’t say that is the way to go, because many times for me it is a preferred way of learning. I love to hear from an expert on a topic. Blending the two makes more sense to me, or selecting the best method for the right situation.
As far as my thoughts on research and educational technology, I don’t believe in using technology for technology’s sake. I believe technology is beneficial when it provides new opportunities, effectiveness, or efficiency. With regard to research, I think I tend to be more interpretive. One case study example that I read recently and was especially interesting to me used an iterative process of problem-solving throughout the weeks of the study. Research that seems to appeal to me are case studies, action research, interviews, observations, and surveys.
Though not definitive, those are my thoughts on the topic at the moment. Perhaps it paints somewhat of a picture for someone more knowledgeable on this topic. For me, it is a starting place for exploring these ideas further.
Catalyst 